![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,238
|
Hello Thor,
Nice to see you presenting this mandau on the forum. Once Maurice steps in any comment from my side becomes futile Can you post a picture of the blade decoration near the handle ? And maybe a picture of teh 2 faint fullers on the blade ? Thanks and best regards, Willem |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,464
|
Quote:
![]() Quote:
That could tell more about the quality of the blade.... |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,261
|
A question for you mandau experts....is it a true mandau if it does not have a convex/concave blade? Does this one? From the photos i would say no.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,238
|
Quote:
This blade is indeed not cancave/convex. So this is not a mandau Both sides are the same. I believe there is a specific name for it parang ".. ..".I am not the best in this name game. Maybe Maurice or Michael can assist. Best regards, Willem |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
Actually it's not called a mandau at all if it is Iban, even if concave/convex, but an ilang or parang ilang.
Some maybe would like to call it a gayang, but based on the "production date" it is probably more correct to just call it an Iban parang (the generic term). Michael |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,238
|
Hello Michael,
Thanks, "parang gayang" was indeed the term I was looking for. Why do you feel that the production date influences the name ? Best regards, Willem |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
Willem,
It's because I suspect that this parang was made for symbolic use, not actual warfare or as a jungle tool. But that's just my personal principle for classifications of weapons... Michael |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|