![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]() Quote:
Bloody hell Robert! Totally missed this one, what a beauty! I'm drooling on the keyboard!! You'll have to keep the mrs a little longer now ![]() If memory serves this isn't the first beautiful present she's found you? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Centerville, Kansas
Posts: 2,196
|
![]()
Hello Gene, and thank you for your compliments on both the gunong and the wifes taste. Yes, she is definitely a keeper and has shown me she has a great eye for spotting nice items. Last year she found and bought a small collection of very nice Moro items for my birthday. The thing is, she has always referred to my collection as a pile of rusty junk and now she is actively looking for and buying items like this.
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,218
|
![]()
Just wondering if my questions are unanswerable, since no one has addressed them. Just to state them again...
How accurately can we date this filigree ball feature that we see on some of these fancier dressed gunongs? How far back can we date the weapon itself? Can't say i've seen anything that can be dated older than very late 19th century. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,224
|
![]()
i seem to recall reading somewhere that the moro started carrying the gunongs somewhere during the insurrection at the end of the 19c/early 20th when they were forbidden to carry the longer kris and barongs in public. the smaller knives could more easily be hidden yet were still deadly at close quarters.
my humble item, hardened edge is very apparent in vinegar etch. ![]() my touristy one: note the pointy luks, thin sheet metal guard, thinner flat x-section blade vs. diamond x-section in the other, no hardened edge or laminations, grip ball rather than the more form-fitting version of the earlier one that fits nicely between the fingers. decorations are incised in the ball, not wirework. ![]() the top one lives on the night stand by my bed justincase. the touristy one is relegated to the closet. ![]() Last edited by kronckew; 14th August 2012 at 04:58 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]() Quote:
When she's buying presents like that the only worry is that you might do something to make her stop! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,280
|
![]()
Here is some good information from Federico's site: look at the gunong section.
http://home.earthlink.net/~federicom...roweapons.html To answer your question, David, the bulbous ferrule seems to be a little later, around the 1930s? Hard to pin down exact dates. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: OKLAHOMA, USA
Posts: 3,138
|
![]()
YOU ARE RIGHT I USED TO CALL THEM PUNAL. I DIDN'T FIND ANYTHING UNDER PUNAL OR KRIS PICTURES OR TEXT. STONE DID GROUP THE KERIS AND MORO KRIS ALL UNDER KRIS IN HIS BOOK BUT NO GUNONGS PICTURED. I AM SURPRIZED.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Manila, Phils.
Posts: 1,042
|
![]()
another anecdotal evidence, on how the gunongs looked like in the 1920s and earlier (taken from antiques magazine, march 1926) ...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,280
|
![]()
Thanks Lorenz. I also have a copy of this magazine and the picture supports Federico's analysis.
The bulbous midsection of the hilt and the bulbous pistol grip is a later, 1930s development. Now the question is were they earlier than 1900? I am sure that some form was present but early gunongs were placed out of site as an emergency piece or often worn in the back as a back up weapon. Much later did they get large, showy, and worn more prominantly. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Manila, Phils.
Posts: 1,042
|
![]()
thanks too, jose. i'm intrigued too on how the bulbous feature came about ...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|