![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
![]()
Hi Norman,
This indeed looks to me like the drilled-out remains of a heavily cup-grease felt wad inserted as a conservative treatment by a curator of some arsenal in the 19th c. I have often seen these and at least one is preserved in perfect condition in my collection. How far back of the muzzle did you locate it and was there any sort of load right behind it? If it was inserted after the gun's active service it should have been set close to the muzzle - as sort of a dust plug. Best, m Last edited by Matchlock; 27th July 2012 at 11:40 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,617
|
![]()
Hi Rick,
A few outcomes possible here, let's hope it is an interesting one. ![]() My Regards, Norman. Hi Michael, This material was gathered form inside the barrel about 6.5cm in front of the touchhole so well down the barrel and not near the muzzle. There is a harder substance behind it and by the clunk of the ramrod it sounds like lead, whether a ball or a plug I don't know. I am in the process of making a tool to extract the 'lead' if indeed it is possible to get it out. Will let you know soon how I get on. Thanks for your continued interest. My Regards, Norman |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,617
|
![]()
Hi,
A little update. I decided to insert a cocktail stick into the touchhole just to see if the 'blockage' went all the way, should have done this before. ![]() ![]() Regards, Norman. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,632
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|