![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,060
|
![]() Quote:
or struck in the iron (blade) similar to no 382 and the mark is afterwards filled with latten/copper? best, |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 129
|
![]()
Sorry, I have used a wrong description.
The marks I know are not inlaid in copper or latten, but struck in the copper/latten, which was before inlaid in the metal of the blade according to dagger No.2 Attached an other mark struck in latten on a Swiss short sword late 15th century. Best Last edited by Swordfish; 31st May 2012 at 03:18 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,060
|
![]()
thank you,this is very interesting!
best, |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 213
|
![]()
Gents,
What do you think about this dagger found in the North Caucasus. Looks very similar to baselard. Or it's more archaic? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|