![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
![]()
Thank you, Cerjak,
For the additional images and information. The flint may be the original - what do you think? It is a pity that 18th c. military guns are too late a subject for me to be really good at; thus I did not notice the differences in the trigger guards. From my former experiences with Austrian and Bavarian 18th c. flintlock muskets though (which was some 30 years ago) I learned that minor differences, such as a 'modernized' trigger guard on an earlier model, seem to have been quite normal with arsenal arms. Basic criteria, like the shape of the lock, are essential. In Blair's scans attached below, you can see both models 1774 (top) and 1794. Best, m |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 1,065
|
![]()
Thank you Michael
difficult to see a difference between this two model ! I will try to buy this book.. Like you I think that it may be the original flint. Regards Cerjak |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
![]()
The buttstock of the m. 1774 is a bit shorter and the trigger guard of the m. 1794 a bit smaller but the diffferences are minor indeed.
The book, among others, is available at amazon: http://www.amazon.com/European-Ameri.../dp/B0006CLEOI Best, m |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|