![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Paris (FR*) Cairo (EG)
Posts: 1,142
|
![]() Quote:
I'm not sure that it's a replica you are correct, when you estimate that it's not a first quality but it's not a reason, for that your "tulwar" been a fake just a rough production 20th C. I think that, for the price you paid, you didn't been too much screwed don't expect to found on all blades, a blacksmith's mark, specially on "tulwar" if I may provide you with an advice; watch and read as far as much you can don't forget the fonction "pictures, or images" from "Google" ā + Dom |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Brooklyn, NY USA
Posts: 227
|
![]()
This is not a fake. Making fakes of such a basic tulwar does not pay as the materials used will cost more than thhe sword itself. This is a type of a munition grade tulwar from teh turn of teh 19th-20th centuries but most likely made not for the military service (those usually have a crudely cut and shallow fuller on both sides of the blade) but by a blacksmith in some village. The blade is simple. So is the hilt, which appears to be missing a tip of a langet and secured with a bent piece of heavy wire or a large nail rather than a rivet. However, this looks like a fully functional sword. 85 Euro may or may not have been too high of a price to pay for it. Personally, I think that the hammer marks give this piece a nice character and it shows good and honest use. I like it!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,209
|
![]()
Completely agree with Dom and Stan.
An honest but simple tulwar. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|