![]() |
|
View Poll Results: Which is the widest arrow that fits comfortably on your screen? | |||
800 pixels |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 18.75% |
1024 pixels |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 37.50% |
1280 pixels |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 31.25% |
Still have plenty of lateral width (likely running 1600 or 1920) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 12.50% |
Voters: 16. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Upstate New York, USA
Posts: 937
|
![]()
Do not be concerned about the image size limits being reduced, that is not under consideration. I just have been seeing more machines that run at 1920 x 1200 native resolution for their screens and wondered if I should bump it up. My primary machine for forums maintenance is at 1280 (x3) and so anything over 1024 gives me the slider bar...
Technical hint - You should always attempt to run at the native resolution of a CRT screen for best image clarity. The operating system should have settings to adjust text and icon size. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|