![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,015
|
![]()
Rick, I don't consider the lion wrongko form to be all that common. Yes, we've seen a few put up here over time, but prior to the internet revolution, the average western collector would have killed to get his hands on a lion wrongko. In my entire collecting life I've seen no more than half a dozen or so old lion form wrongkos. Bearing in mind the number of keris I routinely handle, half a dozen of anything is a very small number of examples.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,235
|
![]() Quote:
How old do you estimate this wrongko to be ? In the Netherlands we see this shape quite often. But often they are of lesser quality and most of them appear to be vet.bring back keris post WW 2 Best regards, Willem Ps. nice ukiran and wrongko. I would guess them to be a set as they have similar patina. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,339
|
![]()
Alan, the carving of the lion is quite good; if this is old work then I agree with you; hard to find .
My own example I consider new; it does not have half the style that this example shows . [edit] If these are rare in the local environment and the 'tide of conquest' has taken them West, could they not have been originally intended for Dutch (in particular) taste only ? ![]() Last edited by Rick; 14th November 2011 at 10:50 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,015
|
![]()
My guess on age is probably around 1890-1930. This is only a guess, it is not based on any special knowledge, only on the apparent age from the photo, and on similar ones I've seen.
Yeah Rick, quality does vary enormously with these, and really nice ones are scarce, but I believe all except the very obviously recent, ie, post 1980, would date from pre-1940. I've seen people theorise that this style of dress was produced specifically for Dutch souvenir hunters. I've never heard this in Jawa or Madura, but from European and American collectors. They might be right. I don't know. But I do know this:- in the Sumenep area of Madura there is an immense variation in wrongko styles, things that I would categorise as folk art, and these appear to be legitimate local styles, not something that was done for the souvenir market. I personally don't back the souvenir for the Dutch theory my feeling is that this style was just another local Madura style that was popular for a while, then dropped from favour. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Alan,
Quote:
Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,280
|
![]()
The lion wrongko normally comes with another kind of hilt. Also is workmanship on wrongko and hilt different, wrongko is better, more carefully carved and finished.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,218
|
![]() Quote:
As for rarity, we do see this dress form somewhat often, but they are much more rare with this level of carving. I have seen maybe a half dozen or more that have this level of carving. Many more that are much more roughly hewn. Of course i don't get out to Dutch flea markets very much. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 68
|
![]() Quote:
Still today on almost every fleamarket you will find one or more of those "lionkerisses", most of the times "poorly" executeded souvenirs from Dutch soldiers who spend some time in "the Far East"... (and to be honest or even blunt, in spite of their colleagues abroad, most Dutch collectors are not interested a bit in those lionkerisses because of their low quality and low value; most of the times they are sold for the amount of 40 or 50 American dollars or 30, 40 Euro's at the most...) Last edited by sjors; 15th November 2011 at 03:44 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Alan,
Quote:
Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|