Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 1st August 2005, 05:16 PM   #1
Tim Simmons
Member
 
Tim Simmons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,854
Default

Without handling the sword, I tend to think it is a fake. I am suspitous of the red material round the scabbard mouth. There is something to me not quite right about the all over corrosion and the red stuff seems untouched and quite fresh. I would have to agree the blade is rather good. Tim
P.S , I also have worries about the brass ring on the pommel.
Tim Simmons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st August 2005, 07:04 PM   #2
Ian
Vikingsword Staff
 
Ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,396
Default

Ariel:

You know the rule my friend -- everything on eBay out that comes from China is not old until conclusively proven otherwise.

This is a recent Chinese version of a Tibetan sword IMO (I know, Tibet is part of China, but this one was not made in Tibet, Bhutan or anywhere else in that neighborhood). The blade is not the traditional hairpin laminated construction and the scabbard seems like it was made from a picture of a Tibetan sword -- just not quite right. It all looks too "new" and complete. A recent repro, I think.

Good luck to the anonymous buyer (another warning sign). At last the shipping seems reasonable.

Ian.
Ian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st August 2005, 07:06 PM   #3
Mark
Member
 
Mark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 987
Default

I find it very alarming that the fakers have gotten to the point of reproducing a hairpin blade pattern. It doesn't look etched either. Buuut ... there is so much about this one that says 'fake' to me. I think it more prudent to to go into detail, since all it does is educate the fakers. I do agree with Tim's assessment of the corrosion, however. Send me an e-mail, if you want my oh-so-insightful comments on why I think it is a repro .
Mark is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.