![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,282
|
![]()
Thank you very much Teodor, and as you know, personally I am very much with you, I believe in leaving weapons status quo with the exception of stabilizing any active rust or corrosion. As Jeff D. mentioned on the original thread, if any restoration is to be done, it should be done professionally and with considerable restraint. There is nothing worse to be than to see an old warrior stripped of the patination it earned through the years, and overcleaned to garish brightness. Not saying that Evgeny or anyone else here would do that but the concerns remain regardless.
Its always good hearing from you! Best regards, Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,282
|
![]()
Entertaining
![]() While Evgeny has 'left our building' it seems that there has been at last some activity on his thread over on 'the other side'. In the developing investigation I see that the pages (apparantly from the Zabloski book) which Vitaly posted on our original thread (on Ethnographic) have been posted on the thread. As thier investigation ensues it seems they believe the sabre is early 17th century, however their observation is based on the Zablonski reference, and none of the material presented here seems to have been of any use to them. My invitation to openly use the material provided here over on the other forum was meant seriously, as I know my research is intended to be shared. Wouldn't it be amazing if those serious about weapons research could 'share' information without interfora politics ? I can recall efforts for years many years ago trying to accomplish that, resulting rather unfortunately in the response. I regret that Evgeny left, and as always saw that glimmer of hope. In any case, thank you all for your kind support here, you guys are great!!! All the best, Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 213
|
![]()
I'm again here)
Jim, I'm very grateful for your very detailed and informative answer! At one of Russian forums I've already heard that this is probably a Cossack's sword/saber. And interestingly enough, that this sword came to me from the Ukraine) I forgot to specify at the beginning, that the pommel (drop-shaped top) is still remained. I do not support reckless "restoration", so I'll try to be very gentle) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,282
|
![]() Quote:
Evgeny, Im very glad to see you back! Too often someone will pop in with a query and then be gone. As noted I feared you had 'left the building' due to the tardy response, so thank you for returning. It is a very nice sabre you have posted, and as I have indicated, the results of research some years ago concerning swords of the Zaporozhian cossacks suggest these Polish sabres are known among those used in the Ukraine. From the tone of your posts, I knew you would favor reasonable degree in restoration and appreciate your diligence in seeking detail. Please keep us posted here of your progress, it is good to see old warriors properly cared for. All the best, Jim |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 213
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,282
|
![]()
Well posted illustration Evgeny!!! Thank you, shows these sabres in context.
Which of the Osprey publications is this from? All best, Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 213
|
![]() Quote:
I don't actually know - found this picture while googling. Now trying to find the link. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 213
|
![]()
...
Last edited by Evgeny_K; 19th September 2011 at 10:05 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|