![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,453
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() Perhaps these shields will go to war after all? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,166
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]()
Detlef/Maurice
Gentlemen, I'm now rather intrigued by some of what this thread has uncovered. The idea that the plain 'spun' shields are heavier than the elaborate cast ones is very interesting and completely counterintuitive to what I'd have expected from looking at them, and handling my own. Would you both be willing to help clarify things with some dimensions and weights as I've not got access or experience to the plain types to make a direct comparison? Best Gene |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,453
|
![]() Quote:
The most damaged one is 29 cm (diameter) and weights 1,94 kilograms.... The other one is 30 cm (diameter) and weights 1,44 kilograms.... The little one is real heavy and small, it has seen some real action according its condition... Hope this helps a little Gene, Kind Regards, Maurice PS I know that Willem has a plain one which is even heavier as my smallest one.. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]() Quote:
It does help indeed Maurice. And not just me I'm sure. They are lovely examples you have. I'm STUNNED by just how heavy they are. Is it a general rule that they got lighter as they fell out of active use? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,228
|
![]() Quote:
only 36 cms diameter / 1,78 kgs See the thread below http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...hlight=peurise |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]()
Cast one:
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,166
|
![]() Quote:
I think that this help you can get better from Maurice since I have handled some plain shields byself but don't own one byself. The dimensions are nearly the same but can't tell for sure a exactly weight but I know from remembering that they quite heavy. What I can still tell you that I think that the both first ones you show seems to be younger as the other both, this is what I see by your pictures and like every time I can be wrong by this. The third and fourth seems to have a better quality and you maybe can confirm this by the weight. ![]() Regards, Detlef |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]()
Cast:
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]() Quote:
I'd be very interested to have the weights and dimensions of your cast shields if thats OK? Best Gene |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,166
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|