![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,280
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,218
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,280
|
![]()
David, it seems you think, I have doubts about existence of your keris. Absolutely not!
I know, you post very seldom pictures of your keris and I understand and deeply respect it. It absolutely wasn't a request to do this. I simply said: "if you would post your's, it would be second I would see, that's all". Oncemore, all I wanted to say in this thread is, calling this feature Kul Buntet is doubtful for me (and I could be wrong), and I have never seen this on a Javanese keris before (and now I do). ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,015
|
![]()
I've seen this effect in the blumbangan in a few keris, I don't know how many, I haven't kept score, but the best example I know of is in a Peninsula keris that is in a friend's collection.
I don't think we can call it a kul buntet, because the kul buntet is a separately forged coil of material that is applied to the blade, this effect shown here in the blumbangan appears to have been created by cutting through layers of pamor, which in itself demonstrates a high degree of skill and beautiful forge control. If in fact it is a coil of pamor material that has been inserted as a plug into the blumbangan, it would be more correct to call it a puser. Examination under magnification should allow determination of one or the other. The wengkon is a seemingly simple pamor, but in fact it is one of the most difficult pamors to forge. It is only very, very recently that a couple of current era makers have mastered the production of this pamor. The example shown here is a nice one. Marco, does the gonjo have a central line of pamor on its top face, as well as its side faces? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Italy
Posts: 928
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,015
|
![]()
Thanks Marco.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,218
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() In respect to Alan's response, i did have some doubts that this was kul buntet which is why i also suggested the possibility of lintang mas which from my reading is apparently to be found at the sorsoran. But it may well be something else as well. Closer examination might tell. ![]() My own keris though is clearly a true kul buntet and the kendit on the gonjo also shows a "belt" on the top of the gonjo. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Central Java
Posts: 13
|
![]()
I have a brojol keris with wengkon pamor ..... I hope, can useful to all
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 103
|
![]()
As I know it here in Java, this kind of pamor in blumbangan called 'tlaga membeng'. "Tlaga" means lake, (much bigger than "blumbang"= pond/fishing pond), "membeng" is rippling water, the effect you get if you throw a stone in the middle of a lake/pond.
It is a very positive pamor. Some are intentionally made, as Marco's, and some aren't. Those who aren't usually came in Beras Wutah or Pedharingan Kebak pamor. On Marco's keris, it's made by the precise cutting of blumbangan through the wengkon line. It also need a precise forging so the wengkon line laid where it should. The best I've seen is a keris with Adeg Wengkon and Tlaga Membeng. Black and shining iron, grey-greenish edge/steel, sharp, white pamor. A pamor lines on each side of ganja. As perfect as if you draw it with a scriber. Simple pamor, but not simple to make. No, I don't make up the term 'Tlaga Membeng' if ones wondering ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,015
|
![]()
Thank you for sharing your opinion with us Pak Boedhi.
It is certain the telaga ngembeng ( membeng, membleng) is a well recognised pamor, however, in my understanding it is an accidental pamor (pamor tiban), it cannot be an intentionally made pamor, and it cannot be created by the insertion of a piece of coiled pamor. Looking at Marco's blade I am uncertain if this effect has been created by insertion of a separate piece of pamor or not. In the example posted by Gustav, it is clear that the lake is formed by pamor already within the body of the blade, however, the exposure of this pamor is so perfect that I doubt it is an accidental exposure. I accept that different interpretations of pamor motifs exist, and I accept that what you have posted is your understanding of what constitutes pamor tlaga membeng. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|