![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,280
|
![]()
Well I as far as I know this piece is Yemani because of the "T" type of hilt.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
![]()
Hi Battara,
That's precisely the issue. I have seen many jambiyas id'ed as Omani with this very same T-feature. I have also seen pictures of Yemeni merchants selling these T-Pommels on their market booths, among other jambiya types. But since I don't know anything about asian blades, I thought that perhaps they were omani-styled daggers made in Yemen. BTW, I have been reading your previous posts on Jambiyas. You obviously are an authority on the subject..! BTW, how can I check if the hilt/scabbard is made of silver? Regards Manuel Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 2,789
|
![]()
From my experience and from various books on the subject, the main telling difference between Omani and other Jambiya is the prolific use of scroll engraving rather than the more complicated and often diamond shaped embellishments of Yemeni and other "Peninsula" types. Identification must also be placed at the steps of those who have written books on the subject. As to accuracy of these authors, one can hope that their sources were from the Arabian Peninsula itself. One book which I do have faith in, and from which I have sourced ACCURATE information, is the catalogue of an exhibition held at the King Faisal Centre in Riyhad, and published as Weapons of the Islamic World-Swords and Armour.
One other way to identify Omani origin is the style of belt buckle (if it still is attached to the belt). A typical Omani buckle is shown on the second and third items below. These buckles originate from Rostaq in the Omani interior. Attached are pics of confirmed Omani examples and also other Peninsula Types. Last edited by kahnjar1; 22nd January 2011 at 06:22 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 2,789
|
![]()
....and some similar but NOT Omani.
The first one comes from Eastern Saudi Arabia along the Omani border so bears some characteristics of the Omani type, but has distinctly Yemeni type decoration style. The rest are from South-Western Saudi near Yemen so have similarities of that style. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,280
|
![]()
Don't know about being an expert, but thank you for the vote of confidence.
![]() Others will know more than I. The hilt looks silver but the scabbard may be white metal or brass. Take it to a jeweler who should have the chemicals to test the metal. Last edited by Battara; 22nd January 2011 at 11:05 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
![]()
I have been studying this subject mostly thanks to current posts made by Battara and Kahnjar. But, I must also thank past contributors such a Michael Blalock, Lew and Steve. Whenever I search Jambias, most of the good hits take me back to our very own forum!
From what I have read, my jambiya is probably made of german silver. The pommel type is known as Meccan, representing the Black Stone, the blade is "watered"(whatever that means), and it may have been made in Yemen's Hadramout Wadi ,or in Saudi Asir. The Omani provenance is unlikely due to the absence of their characteristic scabbard's ring belt holder. The scabbard chape is small, unlike the thum characteristic of Jeda/Mecca. I tried to clean the scabbard's greenish blue deposits with a toothbrush an detergent, to no avail. I'm worried that anything else may affect the leather. Suggestions? BTW, what is the proper spelling: Jambiya, Jambiah, Jambiyah, Jambia? Kukri/Kuhkri/Kuhkuri, and Kahnjar, Kanjar/ Khanjar ..? Best Manuel |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Paris (FR*) Cairo (EG)
Posts: 1,142
|
![]() Quote:
![]() just a convention according with countries, for instance in France we 'll not used the same spelling than in UK i.e. - Jeddah (city) for English - Djeddah (city) for French ![]() now to clarify for you - Jambiya - Khanjar ... "kh" equal a son of "krrr" on the pic, you have - a Jambiya from Hadramout Yemen - a khanjar from Oman à + Dom |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 2,789
|
![]() Quote:
Don't get too wrapped up in the various spellings as they all mean the same thing and probably "Jambiya" is much like the term "Wahabite" used by collectors to describe certain styles. The term "Khanjar" is used in Oman to describe their daggers, rather than "Jambiya". Hopefully STEVE will come in on this post, as he has huge knowledge of (particulaly) Yemeni daggers. Regards Stu |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 1,340
|
![]() Quote:
just want to add that the correct spelling for these type of daggers is Janbiya or Jannabiyah depending on region. Khanjar is also used though you'd probably understand the "kh" if you hear an arab say it. i think the reason why collectors call Janbiya's ; Jambiya is probably due to tourists not hearing the pronunciation correctly. the origin of the word is jnb which means; side. there is no word jmb in arabic that i know of. beautiful collection of pictures folks, i really like the gusbi that Dom has ![]() A.Alnakkas |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Paris (FR*) Cairo (EG)
Posts: 1,142
|
![]()
Hi
on my background, synthetically I classify as follow the daggers with short and curving blade - dagger with 90° angle scabbard as from Saudi or Emirati, or Omani - dagger with 180° angle scabbard as from Yemenite - dagger Saudi 7 rings on scabbard - dagger Emirati and Omani 4 rings on scabbard - dagger Yemenite, no rings - all have the same type of blade (more or less) double edge with a thick central rib it's not a truth "formal" ![]() according with the bearer's residence if ... more or less near of borders, the shape could be significantly different, what's on above is valid as general rule at my point of view ![]() à + Dom |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|