![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Richard,
Quote:
While the quality of the file work does look good and the special style is certainly of interest, I'd guess that this is a 20th c. blade. The separation line does look a bit weird to me and I'm far from convinced that this blade really has a seperate gangya rather than an engraved line... Hilt does look like a makeshift repair, indeed. Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,280
|
![]()
I agree with you Kai in that the blade is probably 20c, perhaps 1920s. However, the separation line does not look like the typical engraved line to me. Better close ups of the line might help us solve the problem.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 803
|
![]()
Thank you again, for sharing your knowlege and advice so freely.
Reading your replies and the other recent posts on Philippine weaponry has already opened my eyes to quite a lot! Thank you, Gentlemen, for your generosity!! Richard. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,339
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Certainly not aimed at the 'pleasure travelers' market . Make do or do without . They made do . ![]() Rick |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|