Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 2nd November 2010, 07:00 PM   #1
cornelistromp
Member
 
cornelistromp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,060
Default

Hi Fernando,

you are welcome.
The Meigen rapier is still in my possession, it has never been separated and has a absolute "sleeper" mint condition and the original grip.
The other rapier is from a trader/collector I know, at the moment I am not into "the rapier" anymore, well I still love to see and handle them but concentrate on earlier swords now, the rusty ones.
The shape of quillons is a matter of personal taste and of course of the type of the fighting school and personal fighting skills.
In Holland the long straight guillons were very popular in the 17thC, actually your type was also very popular in Holland in the first 30 years of the 17thC.
I have seen this sword on some schutter-painting,if I remember where I will post it.

CF. the late 16thC German Rapier with guillons like yours in the plan of the blade for catching/holding your opponents rapier!

best,
Attached Images
 

Last edited by cornelistromp; 2nd November 2010 at 07:30 PM.
cornelistromp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd November 2010, 07:31 PM   #2
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

Thanks once more, Cornelis, for the new precious info

Quote:
Originally Posted by cornelistromp
... I have seen this sword on some schutter-painting,if I remember where I will post it....
Yes, please do; i would love to see it and save it together with my example pictures and data.

Met vriendelijke groeten
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd November 2010, 10:28 PM   #3
Dmitry
Member
 
Dmitry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 607
Default

I told you it was singing to me!
Dmitry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd November 2010, 10:35 PM   #4
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dmitry
I told you it was singing to me!
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd November 2010, 01:10 AM   #5
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,192
Default

Well it sounded like a good possibility.
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd November 2010, 03:16 AM   #6
Matchlock
(deceased)
 
Matchlock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
Default

It definitely does, Cornelis and Jim,

The fact remains though that the pommel is in excavated condition and could never have originally belonged.

Best,
m

Last edited by Matchlock; 3rd November 2010 at 05:49 PM.
Matchlock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd November 2010, 11:41 AM   #7
cornelistromp
Member
 
cornelistromp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,060
Default

That exactly the right size and type of pommel is found is way too coincidental.
no, my vote goes to ORIGINAL.
the color of the metal and the pitting is consistent with other parts of this rapier.
Because mostly the pommel is touched over the time by hands here one sees more severe pitting.

Best,
Attached Images
  
cornelistromp is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.