![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,613
|
![]()
Hi Alexander,
Try the the search function for Klewang, you should get a lot of info on this sword. Regards, Norman. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Do you know how to use the Search function, Alexander?
You will find several threads like this one: CLICK HERE . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,192
|
![]()
Hi Alexander,
Thank you for posting your Dutch klewang. While the search feature here is certainly an option, Im sure you posted the sword to initiate conversation, which is what we do here ![]() As noted helpfully, the term for the sword is a klewang, which was a type of sword used by native inhabitants of Indonesia and Sumatra, I believe., The sword itself is a military version of these type swords, however after the order for small companies of military police, these type swords were ordered from Germany initially. They were then termed 'merechausee klewangs' (=military police) and numbers of them were made originally in Solingen. Later with the advent of WWI, it became impossible for the Dutch to order from Germany, and as I understand, the manufacture was passed to the Dutch arsenal in HEMBRUG in the Netherlands. These swords were involved in various campaigns and conflicts in the Indonesian archipelago and others. The US Navy adopted the pattern for its own model 1917 cutlass, and I believe these Dutch models were around until about 1940. Those are just rudimentary details which might help in your research Alexander, and its great having you with us!!!! All the best, Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Idaho, USA
Posts: 228
|
![]()
Very unusual grip for this model. Also unusual is the finish which is usually a blued blade and black painted/blued guard. I have never seen one with a steel scabbard as opposed to leather. I would guess this one if it came from the factory like this was intended for an officer or perhaps parade use.
bbjw |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,215
|
![]()
if you use the forum search on 'hembrug', all is revealed. there is a book which some of us have (i do not, darn it) that covers all the models of dutch klewang, including the originally posted one of this thread, one of which is on the cover... with luck one of the book owners will contribute in this thread....
one of the solingen german ones from my collection: ![]() this has the more expected blued steel and riveted wood grip and leather & brass scabbard. Last edited by kronckew; 15th November 2010 at 12:18 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]()
Fantastic things.
as a solution to a problem it would be hard to think of a more efficient tool. Isn't there a video somewhere of a repro Klewang being bent in a vice then tested on half a pig? Alexander: Very nice example. Nice find! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Kaboejoetan Galoenggoeng Mélben
Posts: 472
|
![]()
Hullo everybody!
![]() Alexander, I believe what you have there is an M1913 Klewang Marechaussee made by Artillerie Inrichtingen in HEMBRUG. This one appears to have been inspected by WIERSMA, who was active around WWI. It's difficult to be sure by the picture, but up to about 1938, they were nickel-plated and after that, chrome plated. The piece looks all-original, but the only way to be sure is to carefully dismantle it (only if you're confident!), to make sure the numbers on each sub-piece match. Barring that, you may like to make sure that the same 'crowned Z' stamp also appears on the screw at the top of the pommel, on the right-face of the grip collar and on the back inside of the guard. Make sure the serial no. on the back inside of the guard matches the one on the scabbard. BTW ..... kronckew ..... I believe that the scabbard in your picture is that of one made by MILSCO (1946-60). Best, Last edited by Amuk Murugul; 15th November 2010 at 03:44 AM. Reason: spelling correction |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|