![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Madrid / Barcelona
Posts: 256
|
![]()
Thank you for the additonial pictures, Gio.
Just a couple of questions... is the end of the tang threaded, or is my eyes playing tricks on me again? Also, is a mark what I see at the beginning of the tang? Could it be possible to have a close-up? In any event, a nice blade in an unusually excellent condition. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Hi Gio,
... following Marc's impressions. Blade indeed looking too young, for the period it appears to represent ![]() Do we discern some letters, among the other symbols on the blade, as being some initials for IN TOLEDO ? Isn't the maker mark (?) on the tang a bit too close from the blade base? ... just wondering ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 607
|
![]()
Imho, the blade is 1600s-1700s. The shiny appearance is a result of overzealous cleaning with sandpaper or another invasive method, in the not so distant past.
Museums of the world are full of clean shiny blades. I don't hold the crappy state of the blade, or vice versa, a mirror-bright shine as a sign of age, or lack thereof. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
I am far from considering your impressions as not being correct, Dmitry, but i wasn't necessarily judging this blade youth by being overcleaned ... on the contrary.
It's the depth of the symbols and specially the anchor that i find rather considerable; specially if the blade, as you suggest, has been 'thinned' by the sandpapering or polishing endurance, such depth being reduced. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 328
|
![]()
Hi Marc and Fernando,
Thanks a lot for your kind answers. Yes, the end of the tang is threaded and what appears at the beginning of the tang is a mark (see first pic). On the blade appear a few letters and what appear decorative carvings. The letters seem to be : E N T O L on one side and N X T O L on the other. Another older sword of mine (see second pic) has a similar inscription : N T O L |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Madrid / Barcelona
Posts: 256
|
![]()
Just to be completely honest, I haven't discarded a more or less modern replica (pretty well done, that's true), I just lack enough data, at the moment, to say much more than what it has been already said. Here's where things like a traceable provenance kick in to help, for example, and what turns every case in a particular world by itself.
Oh, well, that's what keeps things interesting, too... ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,190
|
![]()
My concerns are the rather heavily embellished 'x's ; that the fuller runs to the root of the blade; the typical Toledo type makers cartouche, often with a T is absent in the blade root area and most apparant, the unusually crisp 'anchor' is within the fuller rather than at its terminus.
Also, I have never seen one of these tangs threaded. But, as Marc has well noted, thats what keeps things interesting, and it would seem that as this type of blade was heavily exported specifically for hilting locally produced or refurbishing damaged rapiers in Spain's colonies. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|