![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 671
|
![]()
Google translation ... and not only
![]() Hello everyone: I live in Argentina, and i do not know english. I can only say that this is a child's rifle, for some important person, to be tought how to handle a firearm. The short barrel confirms this. There are a few specimens in some museums. Affectionately. Fernando Original Spanish: Hola a todos: Resido en Argentina, y no sé inglés. Solamente puedo decir que este es un rifle de niño, para algún personaje importante, para enseñar a manejar un arma de fuego. El corto cañón así lo certifica. Hay en los museos algunos ejemplares. Afectuosamente. Fernando Last edited by fernando; 27th July 2010 at 05:08 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
![]()
Sorry, Fernando K,
This is by no means a rifle made for a child; if so it would not only have a short barrel but all other proportions, lock and stock, would be smaller as well. They, however, are of average adult size. It is, as I said, a Stutzen for huntig in underwood, as they are still built today. Best, Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Caracas - Venezuela
Posts: 15
|
![]()
Sorry for the late answer.
Un saludo Fernando thanks for the wellcome. Michael, certainly it is a hunting rifle, i could figure it out for the animals engraved on the inlay. What i don't know is if the term musket is use only for military and rifle for hunting ?. ![]() Fernando K, michael is correct the rifle is short but heavy and the stock is too big for a boy's hand to properly reach and pull the trigger, saludos. Vicente |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
![]()
Hi Vicente,
I do hope to be able and comprehensively reply to your demanding questions. ![]() 1. A musket is tradionally a heavy military (non-decorated) gun; the term seems to have arisen in the mid 16th century and probably goes back to the Spanish term mosquito for the stinging insect and soon became especially synonymous of the 'sting' of a hot lead ball. So there generally are a few basic criteria for defining a true military musket: - long and heavy (meaning ca. 156-170 cm and 7-10 kg from ca. 1560 to 1620, and ca. 140-150 cm and 4-5 kg from ca. 1625-1680); these data are valid for both matchlock and wheel-lock muskets - usually without decoration, apart from a short time span between ca. 1590 and 1618 when some high quality Suhl and Swiss muskets were delivered with ornamentally carved stocks - barrel never rifled! 2. The definition of whether any kind of restoration or embellishment has been carried out at some later than the working time requires close and intense studies which take decades - meaning that you either have to trust a serious expert or take some hazardous adventures. Sorry but it's just as easy as that. ![]() 3. The butt trap, the cover of which may be a later addition on 'your' rifle, originally was not a 'patch box' like on Kentucky rifles but usually contained either reserve lead balls (the rests of grayish color can often be seen) or accoutermens like a spanner or cleaning tools like a scourer and worm. Best, Michael Last edited by Matchlock; 2nd August 2010 at 12:25 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Hi Michl,
... pardon my curiousity ![]() Quote:
I heard of a somehow distinct explanation for the term, apparently a solid one but ... we never know ![]() 'Nando |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
![]()
Hi 'Nando,
Exactly: we never know. That's why I embedded my argument in a careful phrase: it's the result of many years of reading and I believe remembering that the statemets are based on opinions by Arne Hoff and John F. Hayward. Anyway, I'll try and look 'em up but would be equally thankful of any suggestion and criticism from your side. ![]() I know a bit of those things but I am certainly not the pope of the subject. Any decisive uttering on that early and little documented topic is, in my opinion, quite brave. My dear friend, please do assist my learning and I will be extremely grateful to you as well as to anybody else. Ain't this the most important reason of posting and discussing here anyhow: adding and learning from each other? ![]() Please be patient on me, amigo. The range I've been trying to cover for more than three decades is difficult and consequently demanding enough. I guess I tried to state in one of my first posts after being invited to our forum that most parts of the field I've been trying to plow still are, and in all probability will, sorta 'virgin'. ![]() I would, in each case, be happy to learn about the interpretation you got as a kind of neighboring native speaker! Thanks a lot and best wishes, Michl ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 671
|
![]()
Hello, Cylord
Pardon invoking the translator, but I can not write English. Regarding what you say is a key (lock) automatic open wheel (self-spanning) from the pan (bread), it is. Missing-cup cover (cover-pan) ("but, What is covered?), The cam (lever) and spring (spring) that kept in open-closed position. The hole in the inside left of the key questions, IMHO, is the screw fixing the key to the box (stock) but you will find a threaded hole for a screw that holds the spring. Similarly, find a threaded hole for the screw of the cam, probably covered by the flange or bridge (bridle). Similarly, if you examine the tree, crank shaft or wheel (spindle), you'll notice is a part intended to push the lever, just beginning to turn the wheel. Regarding what you say the trigger (trigger) this type of rifles were double trigger or trigger the hair "(hair trigger) with two triggers, one for mounting and one for disassembly, with an adjustment screw in the middle. In the box (stock), enconmtrarás certainly an area dug for the mechanism of double disparador.Respecto the classification of child gun, do not forget that the term "child" refers to a teenager. Affectionately from Argentina Fernando KeiltyHola, Cylord Perdonarás que recurra al traductor, pero no sé escribir inglés. Respecto a lo que dices que no es una llave (lock) de rueda de apertura automática (self-spanning) de la cazoleta (pan), sí lo es. Falta el cubre-cazoleta (cover-pan) (¿sino, con qué se cubría?), su leva (lever) y el resorte (spring) que la mantenía en pòsición de abierto-cerrado. El agujero de la izquierda del interior de la llave a que te refieres, es el del tornillo de la fijación de la llave a la caja (stock) pero encontrarás un agujero roscado para un tornillo que retiene al resorte. Del mismo modo, encontrarás un agujero roscado para el tornillo de la leva, seguramente cubierto por la brida o puente (bridle). Del mismo modo, si examinas el arbol, eje o cigueñal de la rueda (spindle), verás que tiene una parte destinada a empujar la leva, apenas la rueda comenzaba a girar. Respecto a lo que dices del disparador (trigger) este tipo de rifles tenían doble disparador o "disparador al pelo" (hair trigger) con 2 disparadores, uno para montarlo y otro para desmontarlo, con un tornillo de regulación en el medio. En la caja (stock), enconmtrarás, seguramente, un espacio cavado para el mecanismo del doble disparador.Respecto a la clasificación de arma de niño, no nos olvidemos que la expresión "niño", se refiere a un adolescente. Afectuosamente desde Argentina Ferando Keilty |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|