![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
![]()
Here are some close ups.
It's thin but it still is quite heavy. Can't see how it would be useful as a weapon if it was thicker/heavier? When I "try it out" it has a nice swoosh when doing circular strikes. It has more of a Kampilan feeling than that of a regular sized Panabas. Rick, do you base the post WWII feeling on the size or something else? Thanks, Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,339
|
![]()
Hi Michael ,
I based my initial opinion on the blade and its shape and decoration . Is that brass ferrule really thick material ? Often large Kampilan were bound with heavy iron bands . Usually kampilan blades are inserted into a cut in the hilt so they need lots of reinforcement to take the stresses of use ; thin brass IMO wouldn't really do the job too well . It's a bit of a puzzle ; could the bands on the handle possibly be silver ? Fancy blade and a fairly plain hilt makes me scratch my head a little ; it seems incongruous . ![]() The hilt does look genuinely old though . ![]() BTW great spear that you got from Lew ! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
![]()
Hi Rick,
The ferrule is thick brass and the other rings are also brass but thinner. Actually they are thinner than the iron rings on my more "normal" other Panabas (that has a more chubby but shorter blade)? Thanks on the spear. I am very happy about it because it's very hard to find anything else than Indonesian spears here in Europe. Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|