Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 2nd May 2010, 07:06 PM   #1
kino
Member
 
kino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,018
Default

Quote:
Remembers to pamor from indonesian keris. Is there a sheat with the kris?
Sajen, It does resemble Keris pamor. The scabbard is present but has damage to it. It's can be restored with some effort and time.

Battara, the kris came already polished and etched.

Someone had mentioned that a pocket watch gears could've been used to make the impressions, I highly doubt it, watch parts are very thin. However I have a Kampilan that has a watch gear for eyes.
Attached Images
  
kino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2010, 08:36 PM   #2
VVV
Member
 
VVV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
Default

Thanks for sharing this interesting kris.
In other Muslim areas this motif would be an eyelash, a symbol to avert the evil eye.
I haven't seen it in this combination before but 5 (in your eyes) is the corresponding number for this purpose.
Yours has very nice pamor-like laminations. Usually the ones of this size has twistcore, according
to this old thread with several reference small sized kris.
http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=5834
My guess is late 18th C.

Michael
VVV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2010, 11:22 PM   #3
Battara
EAAF Staff
 
Battara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,280
Default

IMHO these aren't eye lashes but stylized flowers, even though the same type of tool is used for both.
Battara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd May 2010, 12:10 AM   #4
lionzden
Member
 
lionzden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 51
Default

stunning blade
lionzden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd May 2010, 02:56 AM   #5
ThePepperSkull
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 338
Default

Is the hilt (or the pommel more specifically) a new addition? It looks to be to be a replacement.
ThePepperSkull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd May 2010, 04:54 AM   #6
Battara
EAAF Staff
 
Battara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,280
Default

I agree wth the Pepperskull. The more I look at it the more this comes to mind.
Battara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd May 2010, 05:23 PM   #7
mross
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 478
Default

Very, very nice. The smith that made this was a master craftsman to manipulate the steel that way.
mross is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd May 2010, 09:48 PM   #8
kino
Member
 
kino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,018
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePepperSkull
Is the hilt (or the pommel more specifically) a new addition? It looks to be to be a replacement.
New?? If you mean the last 12 yrs or so.., then no, before that I don't know.


Quote:
mross Very, very nice. The smith that made this was a master craftsman to manipulate the steel that way.
Makes me wonder how many blades forged the same way by the same smith are out there obscured by time, grime, lacquer......
kino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th May 2010, 12:10 AM   #9
Dimasalang
Member
 
Dimasalang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 264
Default

Nice!

Last edited by David; 4th May 2010 at 04:48 AM.
Dimasalang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th May 2010, 05:08 AM   #10
ThePepperSkull
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 338
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kino
New?? If you mean the last 12 yrs or so.., then no, before that I don't know.
I'd say within the past 40? Just a ballpark guess.

I say this because of four reasons:

1) the kakatua pommel seems to be quite large in proportion to the blade. Usually if this is the case, then it is in a junggayan kris/a kris with a more decorative pommel (perhaps covered in silver or swassa or made of ivory) from my observations.

2) The grain of wood does not seem to be burled or have a curly/unusual grain. It seems like a regular piece of wood to me. Very nice contrast, and still very well-executed, but it seems to me that if wood were used on a blade as fine as this (at the tme of making), it would be some type of burled or harder to obtain wood/material.

3) The carving on the side of the kakatua seems to match those of more recent manufature. namely how tall it is as it "bottoms out" if that makes any sense. (from the swirl at the top crest region to the beginning of the grip wrap seems longer, like I see on newer kris)

4) The finish on the pommel looks to be some sort of thicker laquer than I see on typically older pommels. Maybe some sort of modern shellac like we see on more contemporary moro swords.



Of course, these are all just personal assessments, so I could be wrong. Those features about the pommel just stood out to me. If it is a restoration, it was obviously done with care. Whoever restored it/replaced the pommel looks like they knew how well the blade was made and cared for. The blade is definitely an old piece.

In any case, it is still a DAMN fine specimen that I am very envious of. This is absolutely wonderful!


Can anyone estimate a date/region of manufacture for this particular blade? Sulu perhaps (just throwing that out there)?

Last edited by ThePepperSkull; 4th May 2010 at 05:22 AM.
ThePepperSkull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th May 2010, 03:45 PM   #11
mross
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 478
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kino
Makes me wonder how many blades forged the same way by the same smith are out there obscured by time, grime, lacquer......
It's a very good ponder-able. In theory a specific smith should be identifiable by his work. Something as unique as your blade would lend it's self very well to this. If another blade shows up very similar good chance same smith. Unfortunately I do not believe there is any written record to identify smiths’ by name
mross is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th May 2010, 09:56 PM   #12
VVV
Member
 
VVV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Battara
IMHO these aren't eye lashes but stylized flowers, even though the same type of tool is used for both.
Here are page extracts from two classic works - Abbot, The Keys of Power and Westermarck, Pagan Survivals in Mohammedan Civilisation - on some traditional Muslim evil eye motifs...

Michael
Attached Images
  
VVV is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.