Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 6th January 2025, 09:27 PM   #12
urbanspaceman
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Tyneside. North-East England
Posts: 618
Default Smallswords in North Britain in the 1600s

Those two smallswords were forged by Adam Oley in Shotley Bridge in c.1688.
They were hilted by a cutler in (The Side) Newcastle, name of Thomas Carnforth.
It is suspected, but as yet unconfirmed, that the larger of the two was presented to the Duke of Northumberland, George Fitzroy, illegitimate son of Charles II, Commander of the 2nd Troop of Horse, along with a Horseman's sword with a smuggled Solingen blade (see pics) and the motifs of the 2nd troop on the shell.
As I said in my opening assertion: we in the North of Britain were slow to adopt the hollow blade smallsword, and were keen to still have some weight and two cutting edges, even when 'off-duty'.
Soon after, John Holles, Duke of Newcastle, commissioned backswords for his militia: they also were forged by Adam Oley in Shotley Bridge (see pic). They were marked SHOTLEY and BRIDGE on either side of the blade.
Holles was a firm royalist, but James II's insistence on a Catholic country (Holles was a staunch protestant) led Holles to support Danby against the King's supporters at York.
I'm afraid all I get when I go to SBG is a blank screen.
Attached Images
   

Last edited by urbanspaceman; 6th January 2025 at 09:38 PM. Reason: typos
urbanspaceman is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.