![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 119
|
![]()
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=150282611722
labeled as persian. however from seeing the hilt, i think its mooroccan. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Agree: Moroccan Jiboula.
And as for it's age ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,614
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 119
|
![]()
somehow i dont think its 700 years old.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,893
|
![]()
The shape of these hilts with symmetrical pommel and crossguard are of the form that are shown in Burton's "Book of the Sword" (1884, p.166) and referred to as 'Zanzibar' swords. Apparantly that reference was taken from an earlier work by Demmin in France, and Charles Buttin (Rummilly, 1933) cites this error, noting that these short swords were actually s'boula from Morocco.
Mr. Buttin lived in Morocco for many years, and was of course well acquainted with the weaponry there, showing several examples of these in his collection published in 1933. These swords do indeed appear through trade route locations as far as Zanzibar, and are minimally included in groupings of weapons of Ethiopia, often carrying Amharic inscriptions. These are believed to be versions of these type weapons fashioned by the Falashas, tribal armourers for the Amharic rulers. This example listed laughably as a Persian short sword tulwar ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|