27th May 2007, 11:05 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 178
|
Repair, restoration.
Up to which point does have one to repair or restore an old ethnographic weapon?
Your opinion. galvano |
28th May 2007, 01:05 AM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
Deja vu all over again...
http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...ht=restoration http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...ht=restoration http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...ht=restoration http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...ht=restoration The opinions vary : some people like to bring their weapons to the original condition, others like to see the ravages of time. Take your pick. All agree that active rust needs to be taken care of and that regular cleaning/oiling is a must. |
28th May 2007, 12:47 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
|
Galvano,
In my opinion, if the sword has all parts intact, it's better to keep and preserve it this way - as original as possible. I often come across loose parts, single blades, etc, and I do enjoy restoring the swords by putting them together and trying to end up with as original design as possible. Nothing wrong with restoring and reviving a neglected sword. When people try to beautify the sword by using or replacing original parts with fancy looking enhancements - this is no good (unless there are no original part available). |
|
|