![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
Quote:
thank you for the explaination. Surely though, the 'flares' would be removed....unless it resulted in an added benefit. I think this 'flare' would provide a larger 'surface area' butted up against a bowl/cupped guard....making it more secure....much like a 'washer' fitted under a nut. These 'flares' do not seem to serve any purpose in the recessed cross guard of the dagger shown. The 15th C fishtailed sword sounds interesting......could you post some pictures ? All the best Regards David |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 214
|
I am not aware of the flares being removed, it simply forms the little bit of forte ( very little in fact ) that exists at least on most of the later smallsword examples i've seen. I cannot find pics of Lee's sword, just one of the two swords of Lee's it was sitting next to. I think this one might be in "Records of the Medieval Sword ", I know a few of Lee's are.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|