![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Interestingly, the crossguard is made of iron, while the Ottomans favoured brass or ( in the Arabian parts of the Empire) they used a lot of silver.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: dc
Posts: 271
|
![]()
Maybe an early form of Sudoko. It does have all nine digits. Talismanic.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Poole England
Posts: 443
|
![]()
How about a date 12-3-56
I.E 12th March 1856 Followed by a 4 digit armoury number 8974 Roy |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,610
|
![]()
Bonk!!!!
![]() Uh..Royston, that makes too much sense!!! Theres gotta be something mystical here . Well done!!! All the best, Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,366
|
![]()
Then it's just coincidence that the numbers 1 to 9 are in there with no repeats .
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]()
I would think its just a simple failure on the part of the engraver to understand the numerals.
In the same way that westerners wear T-Shirts with japanese logos on them that turn out ot be gobbledegook, and Japanese teenagers wear ones with 'english' logos that range from misspelling to downright rude. I would think the maker wanted to add a European inscription and something went wrong. That said, I think the numerals look very early 19thC or earlier. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
![]()
Perhaps numerology is the key.....each number has individual significance and I assume that the order in which they are placed, in some way, fortifies their power / meaning ??
Interestingly the sequence begins with '1' ( God) and ends with '4'....which is suggested to signify God (in Eastern religions)... http://encyclopedia.farlex.com/Master+Numbers+(Numerology) Regards David |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|