![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,991
|
![]()
Yes David, I reversed it --- intentionally.
If I had not reversed it it would be back to front, and impossible to properly view. You see, when you learn all this tangguh and appraisal stuff, you develop something like a set of templates in your mind, so that in order to look at a keris and form any sort of supportable opinion you measure the image against the template that is in your mind. What I did with the original image was to manipulate it into an orientation where a proper assessment could be made. In fact, I often do this with published images of keris before I give an opinion, but I have not previously published or explained this. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,211
|
![]()
You know Alan, i suspected that this was your reasoning and certainly completely valid in that context. But i am afraid that it upset my own personal "photojournalist's ethic of reality" so i just had to present the "correct" orientation.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,991
|
![]()
Yep. I can understand that David.
Ethically, my manipulation sucks, but for the purposes of keris evaluation, its the only one possible. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 318
|
![]()
Alan many thanks for the information on the keris.
I also learned again from the discussion around how to keep the keris to study it. I did not know something as basic as that yet. Regards, Erik |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|