Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 8th July 2009, 01:12 AM   #1
wepnz
Member
 
wepnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5
Default

Oooohh... very nice. Really museums get some of the nicest pieces which ordinary collectors rarely get their hand on . Also, do you have pictures of the plaques or descriptions on the weapons, I'd like to know more about them and the regions they are from. I see Iran and also India (kattars obviously, but also Indian style hilts) and ofcourse the weapons getting lumped under islamic though they might not be.

I particularly like the forearm-guards (bazu-bands I think), especially the one with grape vines and a suitable green background. Also the third pic. sword seems be some kind of royalty due to umbrella symbol but to me the layout looks crude (the square diamond in the middle is noticably at an offset) and not good finish, although I suppose the sheer value of the stones makes up for it .
wepnz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th July 2009, 06:07 AM   #2
Gonzalo G
Member
 
Gonzalo G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Nothern Mexico
Posts: 458
Default

Thank you, Alex, very nice material.
Regards

Gonzalo
Gonzalo G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th July 2009, 08:57 AM   #3
sirupate
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: England
Posts: 373
Default

Great photo's of some beautiful pieces
sirupate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th July 2009, 10:26 AM   #4
ALEX
Member
 
ALEX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wepnz
Oooohh... very nice. Really museums get some of the nicest pieces which ordinary collectors rarely get their hand on . Also, do you have pictures of the plaques or descriptions on the weapons, I'd like to know more about them and the regions they are from. I see Iran and also India (kattars obviously, but also Indian style hilts) and ofcourse the weapons getting lumped under islamic though they might not be.

I particularly like the forearm-guards (bazu-bands I think), especially the one with grape vines and a suitable green background. Also the third pic. sword seems be some kind of royalty due to umbrella symbol but to me the layout looks crude (the square diamond in the middle is noticably at an offset) and not good finish, although I suppose the sheer value of the stones makes up for it .

Thanks to all for the nice comments! I am glad you enjoyed the pictures.

Wepnz, I do have pictures of the description plaques, but did not want to post them for several reasons: 1) not to 'overload' some computers:-); 2) the museum descriptions can not be as accurate as one might think. For example, a spectacular Kilij in the British Museum is labeled as "Yataghan" :-) (see my earlier post with British Museum pictures). As Ward and Jens just mentioned in the other posts - the good books are the best references, in addition to one's own research and studies. This is profusely true!
I think that all weapons in this collection can be considered as Islamic, and Indo-Persian for sure. The 'umbrella' gold inlay is the Royal Mughal emblem. You correctly noticed "non-perfectness" of some stone settings, and this brings up a good point - why a royal-quality weapon would have a crude feature like this? I think the 'mentality' of the old masters was quite different, and what we consider crude now could have been a sign of hand-made quality and beauty of 'non-perfection'. I recently saw a Kremlin exhibit of Ottoman and Persian gifts to the Tsar in the Freer Collection, and the most prized weapons of the 16-18th Century Russian Court had the same "crudely set' stones, and even worst:-). I am sure these masters could have set them up in the perfect geometrical order, but they did not. I think there is a reason behind it.
ALEX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2012, 04:16 PM   #5
Shimmerxxx
Member
 
Shimmerxxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Wickford, UK
Posts: 54
Default

I stopped by the Victoria & Albert Museum on Friday to look at their collection. Whilst not as comprehensive as the Wallace Collection I certainly found enough to keep me happy. Alex has done an excellent job of photographing the items on display. There are a few other pieces dotted about, I've added my photos of those below.

These photos are slightly smaller than my recent addition to the Wallace Collection thread so hopefully won't cause too many computers to overload!

I took photos of the respective information for each piece in the collection, and can provide details if anyone would like to know more.
Attached Images
          
Shimmerxxx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2012, 04:50 PM   #6
Gustav
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,273
Default

Shimmerxxx, thank you for the pictures! I am very interested in the description of both Keris.
Gustav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th November 2013, 07:13 PM   #7
Sylektis
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 138
Default

An other view
Attached Images
      
Sylektis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th November 2013, 08:52 AM   #8
Horsa
Member
 
Horsa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 12
Default

Great pics thanks very much. Having access to these free museum's was one of the highlights of London while I lived there.

An excellent photographic library of the worlds finest collections are building up on EAAF.
Horsa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th November 2013, 03:46 PM   #9
manteris1
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 114
Default

....very nice, thank you.........................jimmy
manteris1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.