![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Witness Protection Program
Posts: 1,730
|
...and i thank you, tom, for your time.
(psst, your message box is full )
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,524
|
Dragged out this old one and etched it this afternoon to find evidence of lamination of the blade and a hardened edge similar to the binangon I showed above.
We know this one is old because it has an older style Visayan scabbard, a wooden disk guard that is asymmetrical, and the blade just looks "old." The beveled edge has been ground many times and shows clear lamination. ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 1,254
|
I thank you, spunjer, for the pictures of a very nice looking old sword
Rick, rather than try to further diagnose from a distance why don't you send me your swords? Just joking Rather than try to further diagnose from a distance, I'll tell you a thing to look for. Look at the spine of the blade on the dog head sword, within the clip, at the very tip. If the surface is clean and etched well, and the hard steel goes all the way to the tip, you should either see the edge bit pinched in, or the hard part will end in a line that runs across the spine, perpendicular to the length of the sword (usually slanty, but only very slightly; nothing one would mistake for a scarf weld). Even in person, there is often no real visual cue to decide between a weld and a hardening line; logic concerning the shape of the line and its relation to any welded grain there may be are largely our tools. There is often a different look to a weld than a hardening line, but one cannot always rely on that in my experiece. Last edited by tom hyle; 1st May 2005 at 01:20 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Witness Protection Program
Posts: 1,730
|
ian,
is that a bathead? better yet, and if you don't mind, can you post a "mugshot" of that baby?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,524
|
Ron:
It's just a common variety of Panay demon/deity figure. Pictures are attached below. Ian. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Witness Protection Program
Posts: 1,730
|
thanks ian. i don't think it's a common type, is it? it seems like it's one of those diety hilt that belongs in "Others" category. it's not your typical round head, rhino horn diety like this dude right here ===>
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,524
|
Spunjer:
You're right to ask how common this particular form of deity hilt might be. I really don't know if this style is common. What I meant to say was that it is a deity hilt of the Panay/Negros form, which is a common finding on these older Visayan tenegre. Ian. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 1,254
|
I think it's a version of a zoomorphic/deity pommel that is common (the nose horn guy; seen some dispute as to who he is...); this particular form of the stylization is not common to my experience, but the subject is not particularly unusual. There are at least 3 standardized stylizations that, at least to me, all seem to be this same guy.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|