Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Keris Warung Kopi
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 3rd June 2009, 02:45 PM   #8
A. G. Maisey
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,991
Default

Pak Ganja, I can understand, I believe, your questioning of this terminology, but I believe that the perspective into which Pak Amuk is attempting to place this question is indeed the correct one.

Of course all these different weapons are not Malaysian weapons. The concept of Malaysia is almost as recent as the concept of Indonesia.

However, all these weapons are weapons of the Malay race.

I understand that you are a man who is well read in history. Consider for a moment the origin of the Malay people in Southern China, Yunnan. Consider the waves of migration which spread down through the Peninsula and into what is now known as the Indonesian Archipelago, but at one time was known as the Malay Archipelago.Consider that it is not so long ago that anthropologists lumped Polynesians and the peoples of South East Asia together, and called them Malayo Polynesian.

The Malay race is very wide spread and very diverse.

So, yes, these are weapons of the Malay Race, but most definitely they cannot all be considered as Malaysian weapons.

This is not a matter for opinion, rather it is a matter of definition in terms, and demonstrable fact.
A. G. Maisey is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.