![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,207
|
Thank you, gentlemen, for remarking on this piece. Oh brother, I didn't even notice the threaded plug until you pointed it out. I assumed it was a front loader. As a breech loader, is it possible this was a true weapon vs signal cannon or rope thrower? Is it thick enough? Is it more likely that if a weapon, it would have been on a swivel vs it's stationary housing? Likewise, as the barrel appears to be of two pieces, does this make it an unlikely weapon? Oppinions?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
Perhaps the threaded breech-plug was specifically designed to help remove failed charges after a hang fire? The rounded shape of its "cascabel" doesn't seem conducive to frequent use. Otherwise, it would have a more squarish form or even a hole, to help turn it with a key.
A gun of this mitey size would be much easier to load from the front... Manuel Luis Quote:
Last edited by celtan; 18th April 2009 at 04:56 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,207
|
Thanks Manuel, and good point. Any guesses as to time period? Do you feel this could have been a small deck gun or more likely a signaler/line thrower? Thanks-
Mark |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
2nd half of 19th C..?
I'd go for the second alternative. Best M Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,207
|
Thanks. I suspected as much due to the completely straight barrel and two-piece assembly. Still an interesting piece...
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|