Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10th March 2009, 11:05 PM   #5
KuKulzA28
Member
 
KuKulzA28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: between work and sleep
Posts: 731
Default

I wonder why so many katars (in my experience) are so small... I'm sure it's been discussed. Can anyone please tell me why? I have medium-sized hands, so the handle bars on a katar I am using would have to be a little more than 4" (10 cm) long so that my whole hand can fit. I have held ones too small for my whole hand and they can still deliver a wicked punch-thrust but it feels vaguely awkward having my fingers outside of the longer parallel guard-bars. The fact some old katars had a metal hood over the back of the hand makes me think they were meant to fit over the whole hand and that the hand was supposed to fit inside the confines of the guard-bars...

Somehow I doubt ancient Indian hands were THAT small. Especially if they were from the warrior caste and had more access to better nutrition and exercise - those people should've been bigger than the average peasant.
KuKulzA28 is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.