![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,209
|
It is a badek. Nice piece, although I have my doubts about the hilt. Attached to the blade it fits perdect in the scabbard. But if you look how it is attached to the blade, it is not how it should be. In my opinion the hilt is a later addition, but not very properly done.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
I don t think this is from Sumatra looks like this is malaysian .
Ben |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,346
|
A beautiful find! Makes me wonder if other examples are also gilded brass instead of gold, for example, in some of these museums.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 987
|
Wow! Where do you find this stuff, Charles?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 3,191
|
Quote:
Simple he has a time machine! Lew |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
Here is a reference badek from South Sulawesi.
Note the similarity in the top part of the scabbard and the angle of the hilt. Henk has a point on the attachment of the hilt. Michael |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,854
|
Thanks guys.
Thanks for the pic VVV...looks just about identical stylistically. The blade and hilt are an odd fit. The ferrule and hilt have obviously been together a long time. For some reason I think the blade is the later addition. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|