![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 33
|
Bad news...
I got in touch with a fellow blade collector who said, that the information on the "crown above c.g" needs to be updated... The crown is not in style of the era for the UK, additionally it is a fact that Cooper and Goodman always marked without a crown. He suspects the marking to have belgian origins. Sorry, to says so: but we have to start anew.... William |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
Hi William,
thanks for letting me know ....never mind, I am sure I will discover the maker at a later date. I have even considered whether the blade may be a re-worked swordstick Here are the pictures of the point.(both magnified) Best Regards David . |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 33
|
Thanks for the pictures,
you are right, the tip looks quite original... I may have another lead on the marking Compare the crown on the following marking with your foil. The blade belongs to a sword produced in 1875 by the Fabrica Nacional de Toledo in Spain. ![]() All the best William |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
Hi William,
thanks for your continuing input . Going back to the Chassepot bayonet marking ...according to the 'caption' the markings of crown and C.G were verified by Anthony Carter. A quick search shows that he is a respected writer on bayonets ...... http://66.102.9.132/search?q=cache:y...lnk&cd=1&gl=uk Perhaps he is mis-informed ....or he knows something we don't However, it was also stated that a number of Chassepots were manufactured in Belgium ......who would have thought a clearly marked blade could be so difficult to identify Quote:
I am glad it is not just 'wishful thinking' (on my part) that the point may be original to the piece Regards David |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|