![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
![]()
Thanks M,
I will dismount the BB upon my return from the "Battle Of The Hook", and will post pics of the innards as soon as feasible. Best, and thanks again for your input. M |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA Georgia
Posts: 1,599
|
![]()
Have you compared the stock with the American Revolutionary war pieces, like the Brown Bess?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
![]()
Hi Fernando,
Seems I survived "The Battle Of The Hook" at Gloucester, now I feel like I'm coated in burnt BP... : ) Just replaced the broken camera, I hope these new macros of the disassembled lock and barrel end better focused than the previous. I sold my India Pattern Bessie a couple weeks ago. The similarities go well beyond the shape of the stock. The Lock is virtually identical (both sides). The trigger mount is different though, but similar in its design. Check the follwing images. Best M ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
![]()
Hi Eley,
One thing that makes me doubt Indian provenance is it's a flintlock, and the Raj began in the mid 19th C., welll after flintlocks were obsolete. That is, unless the brits were providing the sepoys with slightly obsolete weaponry, in case of a potential insurrection... Regards M More photos ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Ai Ai Ai Manolo, that breech plug
![]() A screw instead of a plug? Do you trust it ? Here are some plugs. Fernando . Last edited by fernando; 25th October 2008 at 10:11 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
![]()
Frankly, no. And the end shape of the flint holding screw is flat, instead of pointed. And the finish underneath the barrel's tang and the barrel don't seem well done. Add to that the total lack of markings and we get a confusing picture. Why?
This gun has seen action, there are multiple flint cuts in the side of the barrel, as well as burnt marks around the priming channel/ear and the cazoleta/flash pan has that unmistaken sign of having been flash-burnt repeatedly. Obviously, it was made to be used, not to be sold to unwary tourists. It's functional. Kahnjar's theory looks more plausible now... What do you make of it all? Fake, copy, field repair? Besides the barrel, most of the gun feels legit. ![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() Quote:
But talking about screws, although the lock plate screws don't seem right, having a much too perfect end, for the period, i guess. The lock itself looks too new, i would say. The trigger guard filing detail is rather raw, don't you agree ? Remember what the other guy said about this piece being a kit ? But i will not issue a final diagnosis; don't know enough to do so ![]() Saludos Fernando . |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|