Would you call this a lance or a pike ?

[Ed]

"S" or Snake. In a largely illiterate society, a symbol makes more sense. Gotta check some references.

[Gavin Nugent]

The "S" seems consistant in grouping only with those previously found on Nimchas and those cuban machetes mentioned in past postings from memory.....is there a link???

Gav

[Jim McDougall]

Originally Posted by freebooter

The "S" seems consistant in grouping only with those previously found on Nimchas and those cuban machetes mentioned in past postings from memory.....is there a link???

Gav

Right on Gav!!!! Very well noted!
Those deep squiggle 'S' marks are all over on the blacksmith grade blade on the now identified as Cuban sword example I had. In that case they were stamped in rows all down most of the blade.
It has been suggested in many ethnographic cases that if a single quality or representative trademark imbued quality or talismanic properties in a blade, then several or many! ....well, there's the idea.

We'll see what Ed can find on the S marks. I cannot resist thinking of the serpent metaphor in sword blades from the Viking period describing the pattern welded blades and the classic article by Lee Jones, "The Serpent in the Sword" (I always loved that great title!!

All the best,
Jim

[Ed]

The first things I checked (Stockel for one) showed nothing similar. The problem is that now one must wade thru lots of references with marks being only a peripheral part of the work (The Wallace Cataloge, for example).

Boy, a serious effort against marks would be welcome.

[fernando]

Well, i was considering some points that lead in a contrary direction to that of these marks been the smith's own (or traditional) symbol (isms).
I place myself in those days where rural civilian smiths were not allowed to make weapons from their own willing, but only if they were comissioned by (big shot) clients, for their house defences or private armies.
In such context, how could the smith have the impertinency of striking such show off marks in both sides of the blade and, instead, not the client's symbols ?
I once had a sugestion (Rainer Daehnhardt) that these could be the initials of a family with houses in three different places ... or i didn't catch the correct sense.
I would also guess that multiple equal letters may appear in the construction of coats of arms, indicating various family branches; there are ancestral families with their names starting by an S, such as the Sousas and the Silvas.
... Not that the client couldn't instruct the smith to strike the weapons with 'public' symbolisms, instead of those from his private universe.
Concerning the piece itself, i can assimilate it is a pike later modified into such quoted house defence lance. I may even admit that the iron head and the but spike actually belonged to different weapons and the seller had the idea to join them, makig a composite from his imagination.
... Just wondering. In fact i allways go for actual names or representation marks, by default, and only consider esoteric stuff when supported by actual or consensual evidence .
Fernando

[Ed]

Just sayin'

[Jim McDougall]

Originally Posted by Ed

Just sayin'

Context?

[Ed]

I'm trying to age a new chain mail coif to match an authentic jacket. The rust marks (totally accidental) on the porcelain head looked familiar.

Point is that as humans, meaning can be read into a lot of stuff.