![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
![]()
Kool Kuk
![]() Ragards David |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Nothern Mexico
Posts: 458
|
![]()
It is an astounding piece!! Unusual in many ways, as the wootz composition, the tubular reinforcement on the handle and what it seems to be a recurved blade. This is a very unique piece, if it can be said in this manner. It dreserves a very close study, even in a metallurgical laboratory. To know the provenance and original ownership would be of great importance.
Ward, on which elements do you base your dating of this piece? RSWORD, if is it yours, I must congratulate for this piece, which has the value of a life time of collecting. It dreserves a special place on a great museum. Regards Gonzalo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Austin, Texas USA
Posts: 257
|
![]()
I believe "spectacular" is about the only appropriate description that hasn't already been used. Congratulations!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 637
|
![]()
dating is done by koftkagari as I mentionened that was on 1st blush if I see a closeup I may change my opinion. The decoration looks original not a late addition
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 58
|
![]()
A TRULY UNIQUE AND FANTASTIC EXAMPLE. CONGRATULATIONS. ROD
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Nothern Mexico
Posts: 458
|
![]()
I´m sorry, Ward. I found two ways to understand your statement, and I only wanted to be sure. Thank you for your response. In which way the koftgari of the 19th Century is different from the made in the 18th Century?
RSWORD, would be you so kind as to give measures and weight of your piece? I would think that the blade itself is thin for a khukri, but wisely reinforced with the "T" back to give rigidity and the piece with koftgari decoration which goes over the blade (I don´t recall it´s proper name in english in this moment), to give amortiguation against vibrations. This piece is another unique feature on a khukri. But I can be wrong, as a thicker blade would give a maximum performance to this khukri. Thank you for your attention. My best regards Gonzalo Last edited by Gonzalo G; 7th September 2008 at 08:23 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 96
|
![]()
G'day Rsword,
It is always good to see a new, to me, style of kukri! Thank you for sharing ![]() To display my own ignorance I had thought this piece to be a relative of the tulwar handled similiar bladed examples(The T spine does not extend as far) ![]() ![]() Cheers, Dan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 1,086
|
![]()
Thanks for all the feedback. The blade, when measured along the spine, is a tad over 14" long. The longer handle helps give the blade a nice feel and while not a big, heavy blade, the blade does have some heft to it. I am afraid I do not have a proper scale to weight it. The POB is 2 centimeters past the cho. The blade shape reminds me a bit of a Sossun Pata and perhaps the maker of this blade was familiar with those swords and incorporated some of those features, ie, T-back spine with hollow grind and beveled edge.
I'll try and post some close up pictures of the koftgari later this evening. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|