![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 3,191
|
![]() ![]() Lew |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Italia
Posts: 1,243
|
![]()
Yep, Lew, seems the same
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Italia
Posts: 1,243
|
![]()
Hello Henk, can you explain why do you think that the golok could be more recent than the date? From what I can see the general aspect seems quite old, but my eyes are not so well educated...
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,215
|
![]()
i've seen a few with similar motif, yours seems better executed than mine, which has a number of repairs to the scabbard and a more rudimentary lion grip. not sure how old this one is, metal bands are steel.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,209
|
![]()
Flavio,
Although hard to judge from pictures I noticed that the hulu and the scabbard mouth are made from rather new wood and differ from the lower part of the scabbard. To be honest I think an older scabbard part was taken an a new mouth was carved for it to fit this golok. Also the blade has an appearance that reminds me to more recent goloks I've seen. I don't take the writing on a golok blade very serious. To be honest, older goloks don't have writing on the blade. That's a more recent development. But it is still an atractive golok. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Italia
Posts: 1,243
|
![]()
Thank you Henk for your reply
![]() ![]() Thanks for the help ![]() FLavio |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Italia
Posts: 1,243
|
![]()
And this is the one that is not more mine
![]() All this just for fun and show pieces and learn ![]() ![]() Thank you Henk ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|