Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 28th June 2008, 09:48 PM   #1
M ELEY
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,141
Default

You're got an excellent point there. Yes, that easily could have been the case. Still, this hanger isn't something that I would imagine the average Singhalese warrior in the 17th century would have wanted to carry. The hilt is in the Dutch taste, the grip in the form of the standing Singhalese lion, the protruding guard a crouching hunting dog, the quillons dragon heads and the blade of typical hanger fashion. These hilt patterns were indeed coming out of Ceylon at the time, but for the Dutch market (thus, the ivory smallsword with the exact same hilt pattern). I know the kastane has some of these specifics, but the blade on mine even has 3 fullers and the blade has been painted/stained with a brown primer, something very common for swords that went to sea. Likewise, hangers were very popular with sailors due to their short working-length.
The diamond pattern on the sword being discussed (and on mine) as mentioned in the past is found on some Dutch "dump" coins of the 18th century, BUT the same pattern is found on early (1st Century A.D.) Singhalese coins as well. Because it seems Shri Lanka and Dutch cultures have intermingled during the spice trade years much as the British/Indian and Spanish/Philippine cultures, I might never get an answer . Still, I'm not trying to take away attention from this piece to focus on mine, just thinking aloud. Wish someone could post a pic of a Dutch Dump with this marking on it, may shed some light on Dutch markings on swords...
M ELEY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2008, 11:40 PM   #2
chevalier
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 119
Default

i have a link pertaining to this subject:



http://cgi.ebay.com/17th-Century-VOC...QQcmdZViewItem



its a "buy it now" item, VOC blade marked with the year 1619.


it looks alot like a piso podang to me............
chevalier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2008, 12:34 AM   #3
RhysMichael
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 520
Default

yep it is a piso podang not a tulwar
RhysMichael is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2008, 01:00 AM   #4
RhysMichael
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 520
Default

I just looked at the link again and that is an active auction. I know you meant no infraction but so you know in the future active auction items cannot be discussed on the forums. I made the same mistake when I came here and someone had to tell me.
RhysMichael is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2008, 04:06 AM   #5
Dajak
Member
 
Dajak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
Default

Most off the VOC swords where gifts not for use off fighting but for status .

In that time soldiers had there own weapon not al the same .

Henk is right about this .

Ben
Dajak is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.