|
|
|
22nd June 2008, 03:44 PM
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
The picture of the dot markings are not good enough to decide if they are Bikaner markings, but I doubt if they are. The Bikaner dot markings are mostly shorter, so only better picture can tell.
|
|
|
|
23rd June 2008, 12:30 AM
|
#2 |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,192
|
maybe the dots mean something else
|
|
|
|
|
23rd June 2008, 11:00 AM
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
Quote:
I'll take some better pictures later, thanks all. |
|
|
|
|
|
23rd June 2008, 12:31 PM
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
On the second picture I can see the number 522 on the upper tulwar and 35? on the lower one, so it could be armoury marks.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
