![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,476
|
![]()
Hi David,
That term was indeed intended derisively, and while these neoclassic swords lent well to rather pretensious allusion, they were not especially well balanced nor effective. On that note, I recall an instance some time ago concerning the M1832 U.S. artillery sword, when one was unearthed during construction excavation somewhere in New York. While I'm pretty sure the well known pulp newspapers were not involved, a very wide eyed archaeologist proclaimed he had found evidence of Romans in America!! ![]() Soon afterwards the excavated 'gladius' was correctly identified by a better informed observer, much to the chagrin of the proclaimer. Best regards, Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
![]() Quote:
Hi Jim ![]() thanks for the clarification. It seems that the 'wide eyed archaeologist' should have 'unearthed' some researched facts before making his claims ![]() ![]() All the best David |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,242
|
![]()
Hi All,
Dom you're right about the artillery division - I only considered the foot. The first time I tried the link it wouldn't load, but now it worked. It looks like the frog is a replacement. Here I saw 1831s go for $350 Canadian, quite a bit cheaper than 360EU. Now I wonder what prices are like in France, Germany, etc... on the street in small antique shops. David, when I handled the 1831 it felt like a robust chopper, perhaps akin to a Moro barong. Made for chopping, and chopping well I think. The term was derogatory because the sword had no finesse, one didn't have to be a skilled fencer to use it I imagine. Jim I didn;t know about Le Hussard, thank you for that link. They ahve some 1831s listed at 270EU. Not bad perhaps, but at "bargain" I want less ![]() ![]() Cheers! Emanuel |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|