![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 373
|
![]()
Hi Alam, I would love to round it out but The stem goes too close to the bottom as it is and further rounding would cause it to break through. So I'll have to try again with a bigger piece later.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,248
|
![]()
I see. ok then...
![]() Perhaps you might want to consider a dark hardwood instead? Last edited by Alam Shah; 22nd November 2007 at 05:38 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,180
|
![]()
In my opinion, as it is, the reshaped buntut is acceptable; no need to make any more changes to it. I think the sheath looks good already.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 238
|
![]()
In my opinion, think I would agree with Alam Shah that the buntut should be rounder. I'm feeling 'an unfinished job' on the current buntut. It is done when we cannot do anything into it, a final harmony with the sampir.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,180
|
![]()
Perhaps the unfinished job would be best undertaken by a proper tukang.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|