![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 692
|
![]()
I vote for Greece
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Athens Greece
Posts: 479
|
![]()
It could be Greek. If so, it could be from late 19th century to 1980. I cannot tell from the photos.
Do not be surprised for the recent date. The work is very poor for early 19th century. The silversmiths used to make these knifes for locals till WWII and for tourists after that. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
|
![]()
Thank you Yannis. You've read my mind:-) I second your opinion. I initially thought Albanian, with Balkan as general direction.
Rand, I just guessed Balkan...just a feeling. The workmanship, as Yannis mentioned, is of fairly poor quality, and the half-T-eared hilt tip is more common on Balkan daggers than on Turkish ones (IMHO). And that false edge, not too Turkish either. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: canada
Posts: 90
|
![]()
So how much in certainty would this be a recently made dagger? The chasing and other parts seems to be mid to late 19th century, but the blade has always been the item that caused me to believe that it was possibly mated to old. new or newer blade to old handle sheath.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Athens Greece
Posts: 479
|
![]()
Mavi, only if I could hold it I could say more. You have experience, and if you say the blade is old I am sure it is.
The artwork is always the tricky part of age estimation. We use to see great quality from old masters and lower quality from recent ones. But did all the early 19th c. workshops were good? I dont know. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|