![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 539
|
![]()
Hey Ariel,
Here are a couple photo's I took about 28 years ago of the yataghan for Beyuzid II now on display at the Louve. rand |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 539
|
![]()
Hey Ariel,
There is on more yataghan from this royal workshop, one at the Met, one at the exhibition in France, the one of the photo I posted, there is also one one with a completely solid gold scabbard that is the best of the four. These are the four I know of, have handled three of them....... rand |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,242
|
![]()
Don't think I've seen this before. I was struck by how "Indian" this yataghan looks, particularly the floral decoration. Any chance of a close-up scan?
The bolster is practically of khukri type. So eastern movement of the Macedonian/Greek kopis, eastern development, and a western return as yataghan. Greek kopis/machaira -> Indian adoption, mixed with local experimentation -> sosoun pata and khukri -> yataghan. Thoughts... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,660
|
![]() Quote:
Regards, Teodor |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,242
|
![]()
Hi Teodor,
I unfortunately don't have Elgood's newest book yet. Are you referring to the karakulak knives in the Balkans? It's just that the yataghan posted here has features very similar to Indian weapons, and is actually fairly different from the karakulaks I've seen. This one seems to have a separate khukri-like bolster as opposed to the integral variety seen on karakulas. Looking forward to getting Elgood's book. All the best, Emanuel |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,660
|
![]()
Emanuel,
I would not put too much importance into the bolster, as it is an element found on a whole bunch of knives from throughout the world. I have posted some examples of knives from the Balkans, found with Roman and Byzantine coins, but they generated zero interest. That being said, I cannot claim with any certainty how the yataghan originated. What we have are 2 theories: Theory 1: Alexander the Great and his troops introduced the form into Central Asia and Northern India, then it was adopted by the Turks, who brought it back to the Balkans in the 15th century - almost two milleniums later. Theory 2: The form remained in existence in the Balkans, in utility knives, but was not used for weapons due to other forms being available and preferred, such as the sabre. After the Ottoman conquest and the imposed restrictions on the carrying of arms, long knives with this form made a return as a peasant's weapon, much like the bauerwehr in Central and Western Europe. We also have some facts: - The yataghan is always referred to as a knife. - The earliest examples date from the time immediately after the Ottoman conquest of the Balkans. - While there is plenty of evidence that the sabre was introduced everywhere, there were Turks during the middle ages, there are no archaeological finds or pictorial evidence on the existence of yataghans in Central Asia - from Persia to Turkestan and Northern India. Based on all the above information, we can decide for ourselves individually which theory makes more sense. Best regards, Teodor |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,242
|
![]()
Hi folks,
Here are some more shots of yataghan made by Ahmed Tekelu, slightly different from the one posted by Ariel, dated ca.1525. I'm struck by the Chinese-looking gold decoration. Once again, the bolster construction screams "Nepalese khukri" in my eyes. Emanuel Last edited by Emanuel; 8th November 2013 at 09:49 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|