![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 44
|
![]()
Bill, it appears as if the pommels on our kriss is identical; as a matter of fact, it is! what's your humble opinion in regards to the age of your kriss? I would be interested to know if you don't mind.
Kai, very interesting observation. Yes, smaller pommels has been utilized in the 20th century, and by no means I'm inferring that it's an earlier century monopoly, it's just that this certain style somehow are more common with the earlier krisses. As far as the Maranao bulge: this kriss is interesting in that it's angled enough to be mistaken as Sulu, but yet the small bulge (see picture above) kinda threw it off, hence my theory that this is an earlier form of a Maranao bulge, IMHO... Please keep the comments coming guys. This is indeed a very interesting topic. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() Regards, Kai |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,339
|
![]()
I'm with Kai on this - this is a Sulu blade.
Also the inlay I agree is probably snake scales, but near the top is not jawi but okir decoration - very common on these in this way. A very nice piece. ![]() ![]() On the "elephant" I have seen the exact same thing on those of early 20th century pieces (I even had one once). As far as the pommels are concerned, it is the very small ones that seem to be older in general. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|