|
|
|
7th July 2007, 04:57 PM
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
Posts: 183
|
Hi ganjawulung!
Thank you very much for your opinion. So this keris could date to the 14th - 16th century? And why is the dapur not brojol? Thought it looked exactly like this. Thanks again, Peter |
|
|
|
7th July 2007, 05:40 PM
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: J a k a r t a
Posts: 991
|
Dear Peter,
Between dapur tilampupih and brojol is "slightly" different. And the difference lies on the "ricikan" or details of the blade. If your straight keris has a "tikel alis" (Cahaya, If you don't mind, would you draw the "tikel alis" for me, on Peter's picture please...). But if without tikel alis, then your keris is brojol. Ganjawulung |
|
|
|
|
7th July 2007, 05:41 PM
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: J a k a r t a
Posts: 991
|
Quote:
Tilamupih |
|
|
|
|
|
8th July 2007, 01:25 PM
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 49
|
Quote:
sorry ican get Peter's picture,...Peter can you re-send the picture please? thanks cahaya |
|
|
|
|
|
10th July 2007, 02:35 AM
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,044
|
Pics???
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
