![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 215
|
![]()
Hi ,
Looks like it's from Uzbekistan. I like these, I had two, but let them move to other homes. -d |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Agree 100%: this is a typical Uzbeki Pichok ( in Turkish, it would be pronounced Bichaq). Most of the really old pieces (before ~1920) were destroyed or confiscated by the Russian authorities and up until the break of the USSR, possession and (horror!) manufacture of knives was a criminal offence. One could buy a hunting knife in a store but each knife was numbered and had to be registered with local "militia" (police); without police written certificate the store would not release the knife (rather stupid, because kitchen knives were freely sold and they were just as big and sharp).
Well, after gaining their independence, the Central Asians started making their traditional weapons like crazy. Thus, your guess of the age is unquestionably correct. Most of the knives are of bazaar quality, but some are very good. Yours is the best I've seen; the blade sounds to be superb and even the scabbard is made of real leather (some plastic atrocity is usually used instead). Good hunting! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Clearwater, Florida
Posts: 371
|
![]()
Now that you mention it, I DO recall seeing a plethora of these a few years ago out of a confiscated container or such and even had 3 or 4, but the workmanship and gaudiness were so inferior in comparison that even side by side, it never occurred to me that thay could be the same weapon/knife.
Most were in either velvet or very thin brass scabbards, with many adorned with huge glass jewels!!! I think the emblem also threw me, construing it as Turkish, thus knocking Uzbekistan out of the running. Now I feel REALLY foolish, but it only serves to make me admire this one even more. As it "grew" on me and I studied it more and more, it became evident that it was completely hand made, something unusual compared to most "contemporary" pieces, showing that there ARE still some outstanding traditional craftsmen carrying on time honored traditions, with their work apparently just never making it outside of their homeland. Thank you again for opening my eyes. Mike |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 215
|
![]()
Last year there was a seller on ebay with about 6 or 7 of these, all recent but well-made examples with decorated soft leather sheaths. Haven't seen any more in a long while, but he did tell me that there were some people still making very good ones there. His father was a 1rst gen here and apparently had brought several back from a recent trip.
-d |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
A colleague from Russia just informed me that in his opinion this is an Uighur knife.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Paris (FR*) Cairo (EG)
Posts: 1,142
|
![]() Quote:
I confirm that on field, it's only low grade knifes are offering for trade ![]() even if some blacksmith try to continue the tradition, I was very disappointed by the knifes quality, and the scabbards are made with an horrible plastic ![]() not very glorious all that, unfortunately ... ![]() some more pic's about these 2 Uzbeki Pichok, and also for the blacksmith and his workshop at "Bukhara" http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...ght=Uzbekistan à + Dom |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Not Bukhara: the blade is clearly marked Chust, another town.
And, despite the info from my Russian colleague, I would still vote for the Uzbeki Pichok ( or P'chak) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|