![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,666
|
![]()
The blade profile is diffirent that the one on takoubas, but some of them were mounted with European broadsword blades, so I wonder if this could be a local imitation of such a broadsword blade? It looks like it was certainly locally made.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,458
|
![]()
Hi TVV,
You're right about the use of European trade blades in takoubas, but it seems that takoubas invariably had rounded points, while this blade, distinctly heavier than most takouba blades, clearly has the kaskara spear point. I am inclined to think that since European blades were typically altered in that manner, they would have kept to that peculiarity. Having noted that, I would rethink my comment suggesting that an Omani kattara may have been remounted in Mali, as the kattara tends to have a rounded tip in the examples I have seen, thus would not correspond with this blade. I have always wondered how two broadsword forms such as the kaskara and takouba have remained distinctly separate forms, despite the well known diffusion of edged weapons throughout North Africa. Best regards, Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,666
|
![]()
Jim,
You are as always absolutely correct that there are many differences between takoubas' blades and this one - not only the point, but also the blades on takoubas tend to taper towards the tip, while the edges on this one are parallel. I guess by method of elimination this may actually turn out to be a kaskara blade after all. Regards, Teodor |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
![]()
Looking at the first pictures posted I had assumed that the blade was relatively thin. The 'point' had been noted....but thought that it had been 're-profiled'.
The blade 'close-ups' tell a different story. The blade is relatively thick.....IMHO of local manufacture....and with parallel edges and the 'point' ...as already stated ....seems to suggest a re-hilted Kaskara. The lack of the 'moon' stamps also, I feel, confirms that this is not Takouba. I cannot tell whether the 3 'fullers' have been ground out or chiselled, enhanced pictures suggest that they were ground out with an angle grinder but I am no where near 'sure'. ![]() ![]() If the 'fullers' were formed by an angle grinder at the time this blade was first manufactured ......it would have been 'too young' to have been at Omdurman.... Still, nevertheless a very nice sword ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3
|
![]()
Many thanks to all for the input. I liked the decorations on the scabbard and on the hilt and found the possible place of origin very interesting. Again Thanks. ABooth
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 3,191
|
![]()
Booth
I think this is a variation of a Manding sword with a straight blade probably from a kaskara as far as age goes I would place this between 1898-1920. Here is two of mine with an older European blades. After taking a closer at your sword I think it could possibly be from the late 1890s to 1900. Gentlemen take a good look at the leather on the scabbard it does have a nice old patina and just because the blade is very clean that may not mean a newer sword. I have some older daggers from 1898-1900 and the blades are emaculate. Maybe the warrior was killed at the begining of the battle before he had a chance to use his sword??? You never know ![]() Lew Last edited by LOUIEBLADES; 14th February 2007 at 03:53 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,875
|
![]()
I have ww2 knives with worse condition leather work and blades, and old knives in very good condition as no doubt we all have. So looks can deceive, it all depends on how well things have been kept in the past. This looks like a sword from the western Sahara with a straight blade.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|