Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 20th February 2005, 03:06 PM   #1
tom hyle
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 1,254
Default

That was my first thought, too, but isn't it small for the type?
tom hyle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2005, 03:56 PM   #2
Battara
EAAF Staff
 
Battara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,308
Default

So...I guess that means that it's not Moro.
Battara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2005, 06:02 PM   #3
Mark
Member
 
Mark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 987
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tom hyle
That was my first thought, too, but isn't it small for the type?
Not really, if you consider the size of Homo erectus. It fits pretty nicely in my had, so I would acutally say that it is a little big. The picture is pretty much actual size. Other examples that I have handled (my Dad picked up three in the area -- I was too busy goofing around with by high school friends to look down), were about 3 inches long. I have also seen casts of some of about that size as well.

The more I look at it, the more I think I should give it to a museum, or maybe my alma mater. Its really a priceless artifact.
Mark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2005, 06:08 PM   #4
Radu Transylvanicus
Member
 
Radu Transylvanicus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 2008-2010 Bali, 1998-2008 USA
Posts: 271
Default

Powhatan frisbee

Native american adze/ tool
Radu Transylvanicus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2005, 06:59 PM   #5
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,458
Default

This thread is priceless!!!!! hysterical LOL!!!
Laughter is truly the best medicine!!
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2005, 09:09 PM   #6
fearn
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,247
Default

Interesting! I had the same "It's a hand-axe, no, wait, it's too small" reaction.

Not that I'm arguing. The one hand axe I got to handle in Anthropology way back when was a bit bigger than my hand, or about twice the size of the example you've got here. It was also right handed, something I noticed as a leftie...

Yours is also missing the point that I saw on the other one.

Oh well, at least it shows that they weren't standardizing their knives even then

Neat blade!

Fearn
fearn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st February 2005, 01:41 AM   #7
Andrew
Member
 
Andrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
Default

I guessed hand axe first! It's probably not chert, though.
Andrew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st February 2005, 01:57 AM   #8
Conogre
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Clearwater, Florida
Posts: 371
Default

My favorite response was: "So...I guess that means that it's not Moro."
Priceless!!!!
On the serious side, I keep watching as they have to keep going back and revising tool abilities and such, not only on early humans, but proto-humans and even animals.
Recent information seems to suggest that we humans may not even have a monopoly on serial killings, with the animal culprit being.....................Flipper!!!!!!
Is nothing sacred any longer?
Ooops...there goes serious.
Sorry
Conogre is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.