![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Arabia
Posts: 278
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,842
|
![]()
Okay that rule that out. I did not really under stand what I was doing on a calendar conversion site. The script and number not do look like they were done by a Tudor hand. Compere here and these are informal letters.
http://images.google.com/imgres?imgu...WE:en%26sa%3DG Last edited by Tim Simmons; 21st January 2007 at 05:45 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,842
|
![]()
When I have time latter this evening I will scan some pictures of engraved lettering on 15-18th century blades.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Arabia
Posts: 278
|
![]() Quote:
although it is less cursive. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Tebbetts, Missouri, USA
Posts: 49
|
![]()
Thank you for your pictures and comment.
Are you of the opinion that in the Arab world swordmaking is going the way of Toledo and Thailand where once wonderfull and fantastic weapons are being driven out of the marketplace by ill-ballanced, ugly objects unfit even for gardening? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,842
|
![]()
The ENGLAND 1510 sword looks the spitting image of the 1796 heavy cavalry pattern sword. This sword was in service for 30 years according to Swords of the British Army, The Regulation Patterns 1788 to 1914. Pictures of engraved lettering to follow.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,842
|
![]()
I am having trouble finding pictures of British sword blades earlier than the late 1600s with English engraving on the back. These two pics from the late 1700s help show a more old style especially the numbers. I may well be terribly wrong but to me the engraving looks more modern on the 1510 sword. Clean and lacking any wear. If it is a 1796 sword than it is no wonder it feels good and it has been made into great looking weapon.
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,215
|
![]()
Wow!
I spent a couple days in riyadh back in '95 when i had to get my visa for the UK, but never had a chance to go to the souk. i was working for M. Al-Mojil's construction co., out of Dammam at the time, after having worked for aramco in dhahran for 10 years. never saw any such fine specimens in the shops in al-khobar or dammam while i was there, saw a lot of expensive new swords in silver & gold mounts/scabbards but they never impressed me much, looked like 'dancing' swords, not real battle blades. i was not as knowledgeable then either.... thanks, shukran, siddiqi, for showing those to us. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Arabia
Posts: 278
|
![]() Quote:
It sure looks almost identical to this sword. I guess it is the same blade. Still, I would not understand who would inscribe England 1510 in a tudor fashion on the spine. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Arabia
Posts: 278
|
![]() Quote:
There never were any real bladesmithing tradition in arabia, except for mounting foreign blades with local hilts and scabbards, or so we may think right now. The area of arab arms and armour is probably the least explored in the field of arms and armour. If you would mean quality work, with old blades such as these, or the swords coming out of Ta'if, completely new, I would say yes, cheap Syrian junk is taking over the market. That is not to say that all newly made syrian stuff is bad, some are worthy being called swords. Its just that the bad stuff is driving quality out of the market. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|