![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 473
|
Hi Rick,
Very nice saber. In the photos it looks as if the quillions and guard are welded on. They also don't seem to follow the flow of the rest of the hilt. perhaps they are a later add on? Could you post a closer picture of the quillion and guard? Thanks Jeff |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 473
|
Hi again,
If you have Egerton, in his section of arms of North-Western India Plate XIII item 653 is a similar hilt which is what I suspect your hilt started as. The guard is also similar. it will be nice to hear other opinions. All tyhe best Jeff |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Clearwater, Florida
Posts: 371
|
I've refrained from commenting as it seems inapropriate when all one can do is gush over a piece, but......well, gush!
Beautiful! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 1,254
|
Ordinarily, each quillon has a sort of tang, and these are welded or soldered in between the two halves of the hilt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 1,093
|
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for the reference to Egerton. Yes, the quillons and guard are welded on but I do not believe they are later additions. The gold koftari on both match the grip quite well both in decoration and patina. It is interesting that the example I found in Buttin and the example you found in Egerton have the same grip but different guards and/or quillon. However, I was doing more digging through my references and ran across another example. This one has the exact same hilt but with shamshir blade. It is from an art musuem display from the 1970's. The only description they give for the sword is Mughal sword, 18th century. Here is the pic of the example |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 473
|
Hi Rick
Well, you certainly do have a mystery. On both pieces shown, the quillions appear welded on. Why? They are both very well made, certainly the smith was capable of making it from a single block, or masking the weld. I will see if I can find any more examples. Jeff |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 1,254
|
Here is a man who has never taken apart a tulwar, I think
They usually make the hilt in two hollow-backed shells, welded together, usually by a copper based solder (brazed), each half/shell is cross-shaped, and the arms, as well as the long leg are hollow (the "head" if you will, is flatter, thinner and forms the lagnets. The "leg" becomes the handle, and is also joined to the disc pommel, which may be made of as many as 4 or 5 pieces itself; the hollow remains hollow, to be filled with the pitch adhesive that holds the tang. Each hollow "arm" on the welded/soldered/brazed-up finished hilt is filled with basically a huge round nail. The nail-head (as it were) becomes the swelled tip of the quillon, while the nail itself (and mind you it isn't really a nail, but a purpose-made piece) fills the hollow quillons for part or all of their length. That is the usual tulwar hilt, and yeah, you're right; this ain't quite it that we're seeing here; it's certainly a variation, I'd say. The Turkish cross-shaped hilt may be structured differently, as well as Persian, kaskara ones, Swahili/Arab ones I've seen were split out of a single block, but with a small opening, requiring a seperate ferule. Oops; my shower's gonna run cold!
Last edited by tom hyle; 19th February 2005 at 04:33 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|